Archive for the ‘A1C Test’ Category

Once-Daily Insulin Shot Proves Effective in Study

Tuesday, April 1st, 2008

By Amanda Gardner
HealthDay Reporter
Friday, Mar. 28, 2008; 4:00 AM
Copyright © 2008 ScoutNews, LLC. All rights reserved.

THURSDAY, March 27 (HealthDay News) — Researchers report that a once-daily shot of insulin appears to control blood sugar levels in people with type 2 diabetes just as well as injecting insulin three times a day.

The once-a-day formulation, known as insulin glargine (Lantus), is already on the market, as is insulin lispro (Humalog), which is taken with meals. The new, international study found more patient satisfaction with the glargine.

“This study just confirms that insulin is effective and there are good reasons to use insulin if oral agents are not working,” said Dr. Sue Kirkman, vice president of clinical affairs at the American Diabetes Association. “It’s certainly not that one is good and one is bad.”

The new study did show slight benefits for insulin glargine in terms of patient satisfaction and low blood sugar. But the study was funded by Lantus’ maker, Sanofi Aventis, and other studies funded by makers of other insulin formulations have found slight benefits for those products, too, Kirkman noted.

The results are published in the March 29 edition of The Lancet.

Maintaining strict blood sugar control is critical to avoid the complications of diabetes, which can include blindness, kidney failure, and even amputations.

The American Diabetes Association recommends that concentrations of hemoglobin A1c — a measure of blood sugar control — remain below 7 percent. Lower levels can substantially reduce the risk of diabetes complications.

Type 2 diabetes — often linked to being overweight — is caused by the body’s inability to properly use the hormone insulin, which transports blood sugar to the cells for energy. Type 1 diabetes, which is less common, results from the body’s failure to produce insulin.

Oral medications, along with lifestyle changes such as improved diet and exercise, can often control type 2 diabetes in the beginning. But, in many cases, insulin needs to be added to a patient’s regimen as the disease progresses.

“Diabetes is a worsening epidemic worldwide and studies examining glycemic control are very important,” said Dr. Spyros Mezitis, an endocrinologist at Lenox Hill Hospital in New York City. “Diabetes is not well controlled in many patients and insulin is not used early enough in the treatment algorithm for type 2 diabetes to achieve maximal benefit.”

Lantus is known as a “basal” insulin analogue, meaning it is given once a day either in the morning or at night; it lasts for about 24 hours. Insulin lispro is shorter-acting and is administered with meals.

For the new study, more than 400 men and women with type 2 diabetes that was poorly controlled by oral medication were randomly assigned to receive either Lantus or Humalog. The trial, conducted at 69 study sites in Europe and Australia, lasted 44 weeks. All participants continued to take oral medications.

Blood sugar control was about equivalent in the two groups, with a decrease of 1.7 percent in the Lantus group and 1.9 percent in the Humalog group.

Lantus was associated with a lower risk of low blood sugar. It also offered the advantages of fewer injections and less blood glucose monitoring throughout the day (only once before breakfast). People taking Lantus also experienced less weight gain, the study authors said.

Certainly, Lantus seems to present another, viable option for people with type 2 diabetes, and one that fits with current treatment recommendations, Kirkman said.

“The American Diabetes Association has a consensus treatment algorithm for type 2 diabetes and insulin is suggested as a second- or third-line treatment,” she said. “The suggestion is to start with basal insulin, but that’s really primarily because it tends to be easier to convince a patient to go on one shot a day.”

Dr. Juan Castro, director of the Texas A&M Health Science Center Coastal Bend Health Education Center, said, “I don’t think it [the new study] is going to revolutionize what we’re doing but, to clinicians, it really supports what we have seen in the Hispanic population. Historically there has been a lot of resistance with Hispanic patients to accept the idea of being on insulin. This basal insulin gives us a good transition to help patients accept insulin because it’s only once a day. If, two to three months later, we need to give them lispro, it’s easier for them to accept it.”

  • Share/Bookmark

DAVID MENDOSA: “Fitness and Fatness” by David Mendosa

Monday, February 4th, 2008

We all know that diabetes is a risk factor for heart disease, and we do our best not to collect any more of these factors. Of course, it’s better not to take any other risks with our hearts. But what’s worse, to be fat or to be unfit?

I didn’t know the answer until I read this study in December’s issue of Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, which is the official journal of the American College of Sports Medicine. Nine professors and who knows how many members of the Look Ahead Research group somehow got together to write, “Fitness, Fatness, and Cardiovascular Risk Factors in Type 2 Diabetes: Look AHEAD study.”

One of the study’s authors, Steven Blair of the University of South Carolina, was kind enough to send me the full-text of the article. You can read the abstract online.

This huge study included 5,145 people with type 2 diabetes, all of whom were either overweight or obese. The average age of the people in the study was 59. Not surprisingly, the heaviest people in the study were also the least fit.

The researchers used both the body mass index (BMI) and waist size to determine how fat the people in the study were. Then, the researchers graded the cardiovascular fitness — not muscle strength — of the participants after they worked out on treadmills.
Now, after carefully studying the report, I understand why I didn’t know whether it was better to be fit or to be thin. The answer, it turns out, depends on which risk factors we consider.

Being fit means that you will have a lower A1C and a couple of other less widely known risk factors (the ankle-brachial index, which shows the severity of peripheral arterial disease or PAD, and the Framingham risk score, which measures your risk of having a heart attack in the next 10 years) than when you have a lower BMI.

On the other hand, a lower BMI was associated with a lower systolic blood pressure.

The conclusion seems inescapable to me. We have to be both fit and unfat if we are to avoid the most common severe complications of diabetes.

  • Share/Bookmark

A1C Test

Monday, October 22nd, 2007

Because you have diabetes, you and your doctor, diabetes educator, and other members of your health care team work to keep your blood glucose (sugar) at ideal levels. There are two powerful reasons to work for effective blood sugar control:

  • You will feel better.
  • You may prevent or delay the start of diabetes complications such as nerve, eye, kidney, and blood vessel damage.

One way to keep track of your blood sugar changes is by checking your blood sugar at home. These tests tell you what your blood sugar level is at any one time.

But suppose you want to know how you’ve done overall. There’s a test that can help. An A1C (also known as glycated hemoglobin or HbA1c) test gives you a picture of your average blood glucose control for the past 2 to 3 months. The results give you a good idea of how well your diabetes treatment plan is working.

In some ways, the A1C test is like a baseball player’s season batting average. Both A1C and the batting average tell you about a person’s overall success. Neither a single day’s blood test results nor a single game’s batting record gives the same big picture.

How It Works

You know from the name that the test measures something called A1C. You may wonder what it has to do with your blood sugar control. Hemoglobin is found inside red blood cells. Its job is to carry oxygen from the lungs to all the cells of the body. Hemoglobin, like all proteins, links up with sugars such as glucose.

You know that when you have uncontrolled diabetes you have too much sugar in your bloodstream. This extra glucose enters your red blood cells and links up (or glycates) with molecules of hemoglobin. The more excess glucose in your blood, the more hemoglobin gets glycated. It is possible to measure the percentage of A1C in the blood. The result is an overview of your average blood glucose control for the past few months.

Thanks for the Memories

How does the A1C test look backward? Suppose your blood sugar was high last week. What happened? More glucose hooked up (glycated) with your hemoglobin. This week, your blood glucose is back under control. Still, your red blood cells carry the ‘memory’ of last week’s high blood glucose in the form of more A1C.

This record changes as old red blood cells in your body die and new red blood cells (with fresh hemoglobin) replace them. The amount of A1C in your blood reflects blood sugar control for the past 120 days, or the lifespan of a red blood cell.

In a person who does not have diabetes, about 5% of all hemoglobin is glycated. For someone with diabetes and high blood glucose levels, the A1C level is higher than normal. How high the A1C level rises depends on what the average blood glucose level was during the past weeks and months. Levels can range from normal to as high as 25% if diabetes is badly out of control for a long time.

You should have had your A1C level measured when your diabetes was diagnosed or when treatment for diabetes was started. To watch your overall glucose control, your doctor should measure your A1C level at least twice a year. This is the minimum. There are times when you need to have your A1C level tested about every 3 months. If you change diabetes treatment, such as start a new medicine, or if you are not meeting your blood glucose goals, you and your doctor will want to keep a closer eye on your control.

How Does It Help Diabetes Control?

How can your A1C test results help your control? Here are two examples.

Bob D., 49 years old, has type 2 diabetes. For the past seven years, he and his doctor have worked to control his blood sugar levels with diet and diabetes pills. Recently, Bob’s control has been getting worse. His doctor said that Bob might have to start insulin shots. But first, they agreed that Bob would try an exercise program to improve control.

That was three months ago. Bob stuck to his exercise plan. Last week, when the doctor checked Bob’s blood sugar, it was near the normal range. But the doctor knew a single blood test only showed Bob’s control at that time. It didn’t say much about Bob’s overall blood sugar control.

The doctor sent a sample of Bob’s blood to the lab for an A1C test. The test results would tell how well Bob’s blood sugar had been controlled, on average, for the past few months. The A1C test showed that Bob’s control had improved. With the A1C results, Bob and the doctor had proof that the exercise program was working. The test results also helped Bob know that he could make a difference in his blood sugar control.

The A1C test can also help someone with type 1 diabetes. Nine-year-old Lisa J. and her parents were proud that she could do her own insulin shots and urine tests. Her doctor advised her to begin a routine of two shots a day and to check her blood sugar as well.

Lisa kept records of all her test results. Most were close to the ideal range. But at her next checkup, the doctor checked her blood and found her blood sugar level was high. The doctor sent a sample of Lisa’s blood for an A1C test. The results showed that Lisa’s blood glucose control had in fact been poor for the last few months.

Lisa’s doctor asked Lisa to do a blood sugar check. To the doctor’s surprise, Lisa turned on the timer of her meter before pricking her finger and putting the blood drop on the test strip. The doctor explained to Lisa and her parents that the way Lisa was testing was probably causing the blood sugar test errors.

With time and more accurate blood sugar results, Lisa and her parents got better at using her results to keep food, insulin, and exercise in balance. At later checkups, her blood sugar records and the A1C test results showed good news about her control.

A1C tests can help:

  • Confirm self-testing results or blood test results by the doctor
  • Judge whether a treatment plan is working
  • Show you how healthy choices can make a difference in diabetes control.

Test Limit

Although the A1C test is an important tool, it can’t replace daily self-testing of blood glucose. A1C tests don’t measure your day-to-day control. You can’t adjust your insulin on the basis of your A1C tests. That’s why your blood sugar checks and your log results are so important to staying in effective control.

It is important to know that different labs measure A1C levels in different ways. If you sent one sample of your blood to four different labs, you might get back four different test results.

For example, an 8 at one lab might mean that blood glucose levels have been in the near-normal range. At a second lab, a 9 might be a sign that, on average, blood glucose was high. This doesn’t mean that any of the results are wrong. It does mean that what your results say depends on the way the lab does the test.

Talk to your doctor about your A1C test results. Know that if you change doctors or your doctor changes labs, your test numbers may need to be “read” differently.

The A1C test alone is not enough to measure good blood sugar control. But it is good resource to use along with your daily blood sugar checks, to work for the best possible control.

  • Share/Bookmark