Archive for the ‘Conditions & Treatments’ Category

Diabetics cured in stem-cell treatment advance

Friday, February 22nd, 2008

Diabetics using stem-cell therapy have been able to stop taking insulin injections for the first time, after their bodies started to produce the hormone naturally again.

In a breakthrough trial, 15 young patients with newly diagnosed type 1 diabetes were given drugs to suppress their immune systems followed by transfusions of stem cells drawn from their own blood.

The results show that insulin-dependent diabetics can be freed from reliance on needles by an injection of their own stem cells. The therapy could signal a revolution in the treatment of the condition, which affects more than 300,000 Britons.

People with type 1 diabetes have to give themselves regular injections to control blood-sugar levels, as their ability to create the hormone naturally is destroyed by an immune disorder.

All but two of the volunteers in the trial, details of which are published today in the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA), do not need daily insulin injections up to three years after stopping their treatment regimes.

The findings were released to reporters yesterday as the future of US stem-cell research was being debated in Washington.

Stem cells are immature, unprogrammed cells that have the ability to grow into different kinds of tissue and can be sourced from people of all ages.

Previous studies have suggested that stem-cell therapies offer huge potential to treat a variety of diseases such as Alzheimer’s, Parkinson’s and motor neuron disease. A study by British scientists in November also reported that stem-cell injections could repair organ damage in heart attack victims.

But research using the most versatile kind of stem cells — those acquired from human embryos — is currently opposed by powerful critics, including President Bush.

The JAMA study provides the first clinical evidence for the efficacy of stem cells in type 1 diabetes. Sufferers of the chronic condition, which normally emerges in childhood or early adulthood, have to inject themselves at least four times a day.

Type 2 diabetes, which tends to affect people later in life, is linked to lifestyle factors such as obesity. There are almost two million type 2 diabetics in Briton, most of whom control their blood-sugar levels with pills or through diet.

The new study, by a joint team of Brazilian and American scientists, found that one of the first patients to undergo the procedure has not used any supplemental synthetic

insulin for three years. “Very encouraging results were obtained in a small number of patients with early-onset disease,” the authors, led by Julio Voltarelli, from the University of São Paulo in Ribeirão Preto, Brazil. write. “Ninety-three per cent of patients achieved different periods of insulin independence and treatment-related toxicity was low, with no mortality.”

Type 1 diabetes occurs when the body’s own immune system malfunctions and destroys the insulin-producing beta cells of the pancreas, causing a shortage in the hormone.

By the time most patients receive a clinical diagnosis, 60 to 80 per cent of their beta cells have been wiped out. The disease progresses from this point very quickly, and can result in serious long-term complications including blindness, kidney failure, heart disease and stroke.

Dr Voltarelli’s team hoped that if they intervened early enough they could wipe out and then rebuild the body’s immune system by using stem cells, preverving a reservoir of beta cells and allowing them to to regenerate.

They enrolled Brazilian diabetics aged between 14 and 31 who had been diagnosed within the previous six weeks. After stem cells had been harvested from their blood, they then underwent a mild form of chemotherapy to eliminate the white blood cells causing damage to the pancreas. They were then given transfusions of their own stem cells to help rebuild their immune systems.

Richard Burt, a co-author of the study from Northwestern University’s Feinberg School of Medicine in Chicago, said that 14 of the 15 patients were insulin-free for some time following the treatment. Eleven of those were able to dispense with supplemental insulin immediately following the infusion of stem cells and have not had recourse to synthetic insulin since then, he said.

“Two other patients needed some supplemental insulin for 12 and 20 months after the procedure, but eventually both were able to wean themselves from taking daily shots,” he added. One patient went 12 months without shots, but relapsed a year after treatment after suffering a viral infection, and resumed daily insulin injections. Another volunteer was eliminated from the study because of complications. The therapy, known as autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, has already shown benefits to individuals with a range of auto-immune diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis, Crohn’s disease and lupus.

There are still question marks about exactly how the treatment works, and further studies will be required to fully evaluate it’s safety and efficacy.

“As a research scientist I am always hesitant to speak of a cure, but the initial results have been good and show the importance of conducting more trials,” Dr Burt said.

Given the right funding opportunities, university hospitals in London could be conducting research into the therapy within the next 12 months, he added.

“It will probably be five to eight years before we see a treatment being widely available,” he said.

In an accompanying editorial in JAMA, Dr Jay Skyler, of the Diabetes Research Institute at the University of Miami, wrote: “Research in this field is likely to explode in the next few years and should include randomised controlled trials, as well as mechanistic studies.”

  • Share/Bookmark

Diabetes breakthrough: Toronto scientists cure disease in mice

Wednesday, February 20th, 2008

Tom Blackwell, National Post

Published: Friday, December 15, 2006

In a discovery that has stunned even those behind it, scientists at a Toronto hospital say they have proof the body’s nervous system helps trigger diabetes, opening the door to a potential near-cure of the disease that affects millions of Canadians.

Diabetic mice became healthy virtually overnight after researchers injected a substance to counteract the effect of malfunctioning pain neurons in the pancreas.

“I couldn’t believe it,” said Dr. Michael Salter, a pain expert at the Hospital for Sick Children and one of the scientists. “Mice with diabetes suddenly didn’t have diabetes any more.”

The researchers caution they have yet to confirm their findings in people, but say they expect results from human studies within a year or so. Any treatment that may emerge to help at least some patients would likely be years away from hitting the market.

But the excitement of the team from Sick Kids, whose work is being published today in the journal Cell, is almost palpable.

“I’ve never seen anything like it,” said Dr. Hans Michael Dosch, an immunologist at the hospital and a leader of the studies. “In my career, this is unique.”

Their conclusions upset conventional wisdom that Type 1 diabetes, the most serious form of the illness that typically first appears in childhood, was solely caused by auto-immune responses — the body’s immune system turning on itself.

They also conclude that there are far more similarities than previously thought between Type 1 and Type 2 diabetes, and that nerves likely play a role in other chronic inflammatory conditions, such as asthma and Crohn’s disease.

The “paradigm-changing” study opens “a novel, exciting door to address one of the diseases with large societal impact,” said Dr. Christian Stohler, a leading U.S. pain specialist and dean of dentistry at the University of Maryland, who has reviewed the work.

“The treatment and diagnosis of neuropathic diseases is poised to take a dramatic leap forward because of the impressive research.”

About two million Canadians suffer from diabetes, 10% of them with Type 1, contributing to 41,000 deaths a year.

Insulin replacement therapy is the only treatment of Type 1, and cannot prevent many of the side effects, from heart attacks to kidney failure.

In Type 1 diabetes, the pancreas does not produce enough insulin to shift glucose into the cells that need it. In Type 2 diabetes, the insulin that is produced is not used effectively — something called insulin resistance — also resulting in poor absorption of glucose.

The problems stem partly from inflammation — and eventual death — of insulin-producing islet cells in the pancreas.

Dr. Dosch had concluded in a 1999 paper that there were surprising similarities between diabetes and multiple sclerosis, a central nervous system disease. His interest was also piqued by the presence around the insulin-producing islets of an “enormous” number of nerves, pain neurons primarily used to signal the brain that tissue has been damaged.

Suspecting a link between the nerves and diabetes, he and Dr. Salter used an old experimental trick — injecting capsaicin, the active ingredient in hot chili peppers, to kill the pancreatic sensory nerves in mice that had an equivalent of Type 1 diabetes.

“Then we had the biggest shock of our lives,” Dr. Dosch said. Almost immediately, the islets began producing insulin normally “It was a shock ? really out of left field, because nothing in the literature was saying anything about this.”

It turns out the nerves secrete neuropeptides that are instrumental in the proper functioning of the islets. Further study by the team, which also involved the University of Calgary and the Jackson Laboratory in Maine, found that the nerves in diabetic mice were releasing too little of the neuropeptides, resulting in a “vicious cycle” of stress on the islets.

So next they injected the neuropeptide “substance P” in the pancreases of diabetic mice, a demanding task given the tiny size of the rodent organs. The results were dramatic.

The islet inflammation cleared up and the diabetes was gone. Some have remained in that state for as long as four months, with just one injection.

They also discovered that their treatments curbed the insulin resistance that is the hallmark of Type 2 diabetes, and that insulin resistance is a major factor in Type 1 diabetes, suggesting the two illnesses are quite similar.

While pain scientists have been receptive to the research, immunologists have voiced skepticism at the idea of the nervous system playing such a major role in the disease. Editors of Cell put the Toronto researchers through vigorous review to prove the validity of their conclusions, though an editorial in the publication gives a positive review of the work.

“It will no doubt cause a great deal of consternation,” said Dr. Salter about his paper.

The researchers are now setting out to confirm that the connection between sensory nerves and diabetes holds true in humans. If it does, they will see if their treatments have the same effects on people as they did on mice.

Nothing is for sure, but “there is a great deal of promise,” Dr. Salter said.

  • Share/Bookmark

Honey could save diabetics from amputation

Thursday, February 14th, 2008

Spreading honey on a diabetic ulcer could prevent the need to amputate an infected foot, researchers say.

A doctor at the University of Wisconsin who helped about half a dozen of her diabetic patients avoid amputation has launched a controlled trial to promote the widespread use of honey therapy.

The therapy involves squeezing a thick layer of honey onto the wound after dead skin and bacteria have been removed.

The honey kills bacteria because it is acidic and avoids the complication of bacterial resistance found with standard antibiotics, Jennifer Eddy, a professor at the University’s School of Medicine and Public Health, told AFP.

“This is a tremendously important issue for world health,” she said.

Diabetics typically have poor circulation and decreased ability to fight infection and ulcers can be hard to treat. An amputation is performed every 30 seconds somewhere in the world, Prof Eddy said.

“If we can prove that honey promotes healing in diabetic ulcers, we can offer new hopes for many patients, not to mention the cost benefit, and the issue of bacterial resistance. The possibilities are tremendous.”

Honey therapy is already used to treat bed sores in New Zealand and as an alternative form of medicine in Europe, but has largely been relegated to history books in the United States.

Prof Eddy first heard of it in medical school when a professor commented that of all the ancient remedies, honey actually seemed to work when he tried it out in the laboratory.

She tried honey therapy as a last resort six years ago with a 79-year-old diabetic patient who had developed foot wounds resistant to standard treatments.

“I tried it only after everything else had failed and… we had essentially sent him home to die,” she said. “All antibiotics were stopped when we started honey, and his wounds rapidly healed.”

Prof Eddy hopes to have the trial completed and the results published by 2008 or 2009.

  • Share/Bookmark

DAVID MENDOSA: “Fitness and Fatness” by David Mendosa

Monday, February 4th, 2008

We all know that diabetes is a risk factor for heart disease, and we do our best not to collect any more of these factors. Of course, it’s better not to take any other risks with our hearts. But what’s worse, to be fat or to be unfit?

I didn’t know the answer until I read this study in December’s issue of Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, which is the official journal of the American College of Sports Medicine. Nine professors and who knows how many members of the Look Ahead Research group somehow got together to write, “Fitness, Fatness, and Cardiovascular Risk Factors in Type 2 Diabetes: Look AHEAD study.”

One of the study’s authors, Steven Blair of the University of South Carolina, was kind enough to send me the full-text of the article. You can read the abstract online.

This huge study included 5,145 people with type 2 diabetes, all of whom were either overweight or obese. The average age of the people in the study was 59. Not surprisingly, the heaviest people in the study were also the least fit.

The researchers used both the body mass index (BMI) and waist size to determine how fat the people in the study were. Then, the researchers graded the cardiovascular fitness — not muscle strength — of the participants after they worked out on treadmills.
Now, after carefully studying the report, I understand why I didn’t know whether it was better to be fit or to be thin. The answer, it turns out, depends on which risk factors we consider.

Being fit means that you will have a lower A1C and a couple of other less widely known risk factors (the ankle-brachial index, which shows the severity of peripheral arterial disease or PAD, and the Framingham risk score, which measures your risk of having a heart attack in the next 10 years) than when you have a lower BMI.

On the other hand, a lower BMI was associated with a lower systolic blood pressure.

The conclusion seems inescapable to me. We have to be both fit and unfat if we are to avoid the most common severe complications of diabetes.

  • Share/Bookmark

DAVID MENDOSA: “Curing Diabetes”

Monday, February 4th, 2008

“I was watching some doctors on TV recently where a couple of overweight people with diabetes had three months to see whether they could reduce their weight through good nutrition and exercise,” Gita in Australia emailed me this week. “These people achieved their goals and in describing the results, the doctors made the comment that, ‘They didn’t have diabetes any more.’”

Gita had thought that there is no cure for diabetes. So she searched the Internet and found other doctors who claim that they can reverse it.

Since Gita was still appropriately skeptical, she wrote me. I replied:

If a doctor thoroughly examined me today, he would find absolutely no evidence that I have diabetes (normal A1C, normal weight, normal cholesterol, normal blood pressure, no complications, no diabetes drugs). While it doesn’t look like I have diabetes, I act like I do, so it won’t return. I absolutely must adhere to the best principles of diabetes management to minimize the chances of recurrence.

There is no cure.

The most that I will claim for myself and for anyone who has his or her diabetes absolutely under control is that it is in remission. The word “reversing” is not precise enough for me.

If I had type 1 diabetes, all my efforts would not have put my diabetes into remission. That’s because, based on current understanding, type 1s have lost all their beta cells in their pancreas and nothing can replace them short of a transplant, which would require them to take dangerous immunosuppressive drugs for the rest of their lives.
But I have type 2 diabetes, which is by far more common than type 1. There are two problems with type 2, which is why I call it a “two-hit disease.”

Generally, the first problem that develops is insulin resistance in the cells of our bodies. So the pancreas must secrete more and more insulin in an attempt to get the insulin to transport glucose into the cells where we need it. Then, even before diabetes develops, these people — who we say have pre-diabetes or the metabolic syndrome — start to burn out their beta cells. They lose some of the beta cells in their pancreas, although not all of them (or essentially all of them) as type 1s do.

It is the insulin resistance that is reversible.

But we have absolutely no evidence in living people that any of the things that I did to put my diabetes into remission or those doctors did with the overweight people on the TV show that you saw will help to regenerate those dead beta cells. So people like me have to be extremely careful in our weight management and exercise lifestyle since we are essentially running on a gas tank that is nearly running out.

That said, there is some test tube evidence that we might be able to regenerate beta cells now or in the near future. This beta cell neogenesis might possibly be a huge side effect of taking the drug Byetta (and possibly some other drugs including insulin and Symlin), which I took for two years. It also looks like it might be occurring when tested in animals, but humans are a bit different from them.

This problem is the Heisenberg principle — that you can’t measure something without changing it. Most likely, the only way that we have to measure beta cell neogenesis is probably through an autopsy. For some personal reason, no one has volunteered.

http://www.healthcentral.com/diabetes/c/17/20924/curing-diabetes/

  • Share/Bookmark