Archive for the ‘Type 2 Diabetes’ Category

Diabetes Drug Slows Clogging of Arteries

Wednesday, April 2nd, 2008

By Amanda Gardner
HealthDay Reporter
Tuesday, Apr. 1, 2008; 4:00 AM
Copyright © 2008 ScoutNews, LLC. All rights reserved.

MONDAY, March 31 (HealthDay News) — The diabetes drug Actos is better than another diabetes drug, Amaryl, at slowing clogging of the arteries in patients with both type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease.

The Cleveland Clinic researchers behind the new findings say this is the first time that a diabetes medication has been shown to slow atherosclerosis, giving doctors new insight into which drugs may be most effective and safest for this group of patients.

“As we go forward, the study tells us that we must do comparative effectiveness trials looking at different diabetes strategies,” study author Steve Nissen, chairman of the department of cardiovascular medicine at Cleveland Clinic, said Monday. “We can’t just focus on pricking your finger, getting blood sugar down. The goal in diabetes therapy is to prevent complications, and the most feared complication is heart disease, which will kill 75 percent of all diabetics. I’m thrilled with results.”

Another expert hailed the results.

“The biggest news here is that pioglitazone [Actos] appears safe, does not increase cardiovascular risk, and may even reduce it,” said Dr. Robert Scott III, an assistant professor of internal medicine at the Texas A&M Health Science Center College of Medicine and senior staff cardiologist with Scott&White in Temple, Texas. “It looks safe to use in people with coronary artery disease, and it is well-tolerated. We may need another trial to see how it helps, but at least it doesn’t hurt, and that was our biggest concern.”

The findings are published in the April 2 issue of the Journal of the American Medical Association and were released Monday to coincide with a presentation at the American College of Cardiology annual meeting, in Chicago. The research was funded by Takeda Pharmaceuticals North America Inc., which makes Actos.

Individuals with type 2 diabetes are particularly susceptible to atherosclerosis, as evidenced by the fact that 75 percent of this group eventually die of cardiovascular disease.

Amaryl (glimepiride) belongs to a class of drugs known as sulfulonylureas, which have been prescribed for decades. Actos, along with its cousin Avandia, is a thiazolidinedione, a relatively new class of diabetes drugs.

Both Actos and Avandia appear to increase the risk of heart failure (the entire class now carries a black-box warning to that effect), but Avandia has been associated with an increased risk of heart attack, while Actos has been linked with a reduced risk of negative cardiovascular outcomes.

“Both are associated with heart failure, but there were increased deaths [with Avandia],” said Dr. Stanley Mirsky, an endocrinologist with Lenox Hill Hospital in New York City and co-author of the Diabetes Survival Guide.

For this study, 543 patients with both coronary disease and type 2 diabetes were randomized to receive either Amaryl or Actos for 18 months. Actos works by making the body more sensitive to insulin, while Amaryl works by spurring the body to produce more insulin. All participants were also taking medications for heart disease.

Progression of atherosclerosis was measured by intravascular ultrasonography in the 360 patients who actually completed the study.

One measure found a 0.73 increase in plaque in the Amaryl group versus a 0.16 decrease in the Actos group. A second measure found a 0.64 increase for Amaryl and a 0.06 decrease for Actos.

The study was not designed to measure actual clinical endpoints, meaning cardiovascular events or death.

The authors stated that the exact mechanisms for the decreases associated with Actos were unclear, although several biomarkers linked to atherosclerosis progression were impacted by the drug, including a 16 percent increase in HDL or “good” cholesterol, a 15 percent reduction in triglyceride levels, and a 45 percent drop in C-reactive protein (CRP) levels.

It’s also not clear if the benefits associated with Actos extend to other medications in that class of drugs.

An accompanying editorial found the results “reassuring.”

“You’ve got to take into consideration the benefit of preventing heart attacks may be greater than the few people who get heart failure,” Mirsky said.

If you want to buy Actos click here: http://www.myfamilydrugstore.com/item/anti_diabetic/actos.html

To buy Avandia: http://www.myfamilydrugstore.com/item/anti_diabetic/avandia.html

Amaryl: http://www.myfamilydrugstore.com/item/anti_diabetic/amaryl.html

  • Share/Bookmark

Once-Daily Insulin Shot Proves Effective in Study

Tuesday, April 1st, 2008

By Amanda Gardner
HealthDay Reporter
Friday, Mar. 28, 2008; 4:00 AM
Copyright © 2008 ScoutNews, LLC. All rights reserved.

THURSDAY, March 27 (HealthDay News) — Researchers report that a once-daily shot of insulin appears to control blood sugar levels in people with type 2 diabetes just as well as injecting insulin three times a day.

The once-a-day formulation, known as insulin glargine (Lantus), is already on the market, as is insulin lispro (Humalog), which is taken with meals. The new, international study found more patient satisfaction with the glargine.

“This study just confirms that insulin is effective and there are good reasons to use insulin if oral agents are not working,” said Dr. Sue Kirkman, vice president of clinical affairs at the American Diabetes Association. “It’s certainly not that one is good and one is bad.”

The new study did show slight benefits for insulin glargine in terms of patient satisfaction and low blood sugar. But the study was funded by Lantus’ maker, Sanofi Aventis, and other studies funded by makers of other insulin formulations have found slight benefits for those products, too, Kirkman noted.

The results are published in the March 29 edition of The Lancet.

Maintaining strict blood sugar control is critical to avoid the complications of diabetes, which can include blindness, kidney failure, and even amputations.

The American Diabetes Association recommends that concentrations of hemoglobin A1c — a measure of blood sugar control — remain below 7 percent. Lower levels can substantially reduce the risk of diabetes complications.

Type 2 diabetes — often linked to being overweight — is caused by the body’s inability to properly use the hormone insulin, which transports blood sugar to the cells for energy. Type 1 diabetes, which is less common, results from the body’s failure to produce insulin.

Oral medications, along with lifestyle changes such as improved diet and exercise, can often control type 2 diabetes in the beginning. But, in many cases, insulin needs to be added to a patient’s regimen as the disease progresses.

“Diabetes is a worsening epidemic worldwide and studies examining glycemic control are very important,” said Dr. Spyros Mezitis, an endocrinologist at Lenox Hill Hospital in New York City. “Diabetes is not well controlled in many patients and insulin is not used early enough in the treatment algorithm for type 2 diabetes to achieve maximal benefit.”

Lantus is known as a “basal” insulin analogue, meaning it is given once a day either in the morning or at night; it lasts for about 24 hours. Insulin lispro is shorter-acting and is administered with meals.

For the new study, more than 400 men and women with type 2 diabetes that was poorly controlled by oral medication were randomly assigned to receive either Lantus or Humalog. The trial, conducted at 69 study sites in Europe and Australia, lasted 44 weeks. All participants continued to take oral medications.

Blood sugar control was about equivalent in the two groups, with a decrease of 1.7 percent in the Lantus group and 1.9 percent in the Humalog group.

Lantus was associated with a lower risk of low blood sugar. It also offered the advantages of fewer injections and less blood glucose monitoring throughout the day (only once before breakfast). People taking Lantus also experienced less weight gain, the study authors said.

Certainly, Lantus seems to present another, viable option for people with type 2 diabetes, and one that fits with current treatment recommendations, Kirkman said.

“The American Diabetes Association has a consensus treatment algorithm for type 2 diabetes and insulin is suggested as a second- or third-line treatment,” she said. “The suggestion is to start with basal insulin, but that’s really primarily because it tends to be easier to convince a patient to go on one shot a day.”

Dr. Juan Castro, director of the Texas A&M Health Science Center Coastal Bend Health Education Center, said, “I don’t think it [the new study] is going to revolutionize what we’re doing but, to clinicians, it really supports what we have seen in the Hispanic population. Historically there has been a lot of resistance with Hispanic patients to accept the idea of being on insulin. This basal insulin gives us a good transition to help patients accept insulin because it’s only once a day. If, two to three months later, we need to give them lispro, it’s easier for them to accept it.”

  • Share/Bookmark

Fighting Type 2 Diabetes

Sunday, March 16th, 2008

BOSTON (Ivanhoe Broadcast News) — Nearly 21 million people in the United States are living with diabetes, and as many as 95 percent of diabetics have type 2 diabetes. Treating it has been a tough challenge for doctors. There are lots of drugs to help control blood sugar levels but none target the cause.

“None of the currently available medications are perfect, and one of the biggest problems we have with the current medications is they don’t really treat the basic problem,” Steven Shoelson, M.D., Ph.D., a diabetes researcher at Joslin Diabetes Center in Boston, tells Ivanhoe.

Fighting Type 2 DiabetesBut Dr. Shoelson says the drug salsalate could change that. It’s an anti-inflammatory drug for arthritis that’s been around since the 1800s. “It’s strange that we are using a drug that has been around for a long time to treat a disease that has been around for a long time,” he says.

New research shows a protein that triggers inflammation is turned on in overweight people. The inflammation leads to insulin resistance and type 2 diabetes. Salsalate shuts off that protein.

“We think getting at the cause may have beneficial effects that we have not even anticipated,” Dr. Shoelson says. An early study shows the drug significantly improves blood sugar levels. “The people who got no drug at all had absolutely no change in their blood sugars.”

The drug also lowers triglyceride levels, and Dr. Shoelson says it may reduce heart disease risk as well.

Fighting Type 2 DiabetesJerry Silva was in that early study and saw his blood sugars drop. “I tend to be the kind of person who does not like to take medications if I don’t have to,” he says. But since the study ended, he’s lost 20 pounds. Instead of drugs, he now controls his diabetes with diet and exercise. “If I cannot walk around anymore or if my body stops responding positively to natural ways of reducing it; this is something I would definitely consider taking.”

Article by: Ivanhoe Broadcast News, Inc.

  • Share/Bookmark

Misreading Avandia

Wednesday, March 12th, 2008

The recent ruckus over the drug rosiglitazone (Avandia) has been portrayed as another case of Big Pharma foisting a dangerous drug on the public while the overworked FDA can’t keep up.

Search Google for Avandia and Vioxx, and you’ll come up with more than three-quarters of a million hits, including ads from law firms ready to litigate.

There is an enormous difference between the two situations. In the case of Vioxx, it was alleged that otherwise healthy people suffered sudden cardiac disease and death after using the pain reliever. This new study, published in the New England Journal of Medicine on May 21, alleges that Avandia causes an unacceptable rise in risk of heart attack. This—at least from the evidence presented—is hard to believe.

[Image]
From The New England Journal of Medicine , 21 May, 2007

There are several ways to read the statistics that “support” this study.

Those in the Avandia meta-study were not only diabetics, but diabetics whose disease was initially out of control, with average blood sugar levels approaching three times those of non-diabetics and blood sugars at the ends of the studies undisclosed. The complications of diabetes—in this case heart disease—are caused by the prolonged elevation of blood sugars.

With a little math, we can easily conclude, for example, that metformin is about 4.75*-fold more likely to cause more cardiac deaths than insulin. We can also conclude that placebo is about 4.4**-fold more likely to cause more cardiac deaths than insulin. Which should lead us to the conclusion that since insulin is the most effective of these medications at lowering blood sugars, it is likewise more effective at reducing diabetic complications such as the risk of cardiac death.

The other drugs are considerably less effective in doing that job—but the sulfonylureas, while more effective than metformin or rosiglitazone in the short term, are problematic because they can over time, burn out remaining insulin-producing beta cells.

The real story behind these figures is that there are a lot of health care professionals who are not doing their jobs. Anyone with an initial (as in this study) HgbA1c level of 8.2 percent (equating to sustained average blood sugar levels of about 228 milligrams per deciliter) should be treated with insulin (and a low carbohydrate diet) since no combination of the other drugs can get such blood sugars normalized. The other drugs can have marginal effects in reducing blood sugar levels, but are not nearly so effective as insulin.

Blood sugars of diabetics can be normalized. The real ‘scandal’ is that very few health care professionals think that diabetics have the right to the same blood sugars as non-diabetics. They therefore leave their patients wide open to an unnecessary “potential for serious adverse cardiovascular effects.

Product Description

Most important information about Avandia

Pharmacokinetics

Possible Side Effects

More information about AVANDIA (Rosiglitazone):

AVANDIA (Rosiglitazone): What You Should Know

Can Avandia or other drugs prevent diabetes?

Actos beats Avandia in sugar, fat control: study

Avandia approved for combination with insulin in type 2 diabetes treatment

Avandia Reduces Risk of Progresson from Pre-Diabetes to Type 2 Diabetes by 62 percent

EMEA Statement on Recent Publication on Cardiac Safety of Rosiglitazone (Avandia, Avandamet, Avaglim)

GSK Revises US Labeling for Avandia

Data Affirms Avandia (Rosiglitazone maleate) Cardiovascular Safety Profile

Reaction to Avandia Warnings Stronger Among Internists Than Endocrinologists, According to Study by GfK Market Measures

Texas Family Sues GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) Over Man’s Heart Attack Death Following Avandia Use

Older Diabetics Using Avandia Face Increased Death Risk

FDA MedWatch Alerts: Avandia (rosiglitazone maleate)

Diabetes drugs dangers revealed

To buy AVANDIA click HERE: My Family Drugstore

  • Share/Bookmark

Constant High Blood Sugar Disables Insulin ‘Off’ Switch

Thursday, March 6th, 2008

Thursday, Mar. 6, 2008; 3:00 PM
Copyright © 2008 ScoutNews, LLC. All rights reserved.

THURSDAY, March 6 (HealthDay News) — Chronically high blood glucose levels disable the molecular switch that normally turns off sugar production in the liver in response to increasing insulin levels, a California study finds.

This finding suggests that inhibiting the enzymatic pathway that disables the “sugar-off” switch (CRTC2) may help lower glucose levels in people with diabetes and reduce long-term complications associated with the disease, the researchers said.

The study, by researchers at the Salk Institute for Biological Studies, in La Jolla, Calif., is published in the March 7 issue of Science.

In healthy people, the CRTC2 switch turns on glucose production in the liver when blood glucose levels decline during the night. After a meal, insulin shuts down CRTC2, thus ensuring that blood sugar levels don’t rise too high.

But in many people with type 2 diabetes, CRTC2 no longer responds to increasing insulin levels. As a result, the liver keeps on pumping out glucose, even if blood glucose levels are already elevated.

In research with mice, the Salk team focused on the hexosamine biosynthetic pathway. Activation of this pathway promotes the addition of sugar molecules to proteins, a process called O-glycosylation.

“It had been known that increases in the concentration of circulating glucose activate the hexosamine biosynthetic pathway. But we had no idea that the resulting O-glycosylation would lock CRTC2 in the ‘on’ position,” study first author Renaud Dentin said in a prepared statement.

Dentin’s team decreased the activity of the hexosamine biosynthetic pathway in insulin-resistant diabetic mice and in mice fed a high-fat diet (both groups had high blood sugar levels) and found a marked improvement in glucose tolerance and insulin sensitivity.

  • Share/Bookmark